Ptgui pro loading portrait and landscape

Ptgui pro loading portrait and landscape manual#
Ptgui pro loading portrait and landscape software#

Some experience of 360 and I kinda understand some of the practical difficulties. I have some experience of aerial photography, not drones or kites but the in the air stuff. Your issue just got me interested again in revisiting 11. But so much depends on me and what I shoot, so I abandoned the discussions. This increased length of workflow too in order to use fusion on some jobs I would shoot for longer. It is more convenient on occasion to use aperture priority and quicker depending on location, (I was half way up an ice wall on one occasion(!), how busy the place is, type of trigger I can use with which camera etc. Another example is switching from aperture priority to manual. However this is going to be very difficult for Joost or anyone there to reproduce. There's something about sampling thats different. This also got me curious because I think, in fact I know, my workflow time has gone up with 11 on large jobs and I am deleting points more on 11 than 10. I notice this in harmonic sequences in an image, so picture-white wall-picture, is a bit like a wave of white and then colour. You said when you deleted points in certain areas you better results. Joost mentioned sampling differences between 10 and 11 in his reply to you and that got me interested. But as it always worked and now doesn't that suggests somethings different and I thought it would be easy to have a template around that difference. It was suggested than 10 should not really have worked anyway.

Mine began by noticing whereas 10 was tolerant to Aperture priority mode on fusion it is not on 11. The problem you have is broadly NOT the same as mine. Again next time I have this challenge, I have a shoot in May in such a location you can have all the outputs and compare 10 and 11 yourself if you have time.

Ptgui pro loading portrait and landscape manual#

I know we debated this before you concentrated on auto versus manual but its not made much difference. !! might be better with varied imagery although thats an impression.

Ptgui pro loading portrait and landscape software#

I want the software to concentrate on that an not pickout two different defects in the white walls miles apart. Suppose there is a vase that straddles most of near frame edge areas from each shot. I'd like a software switch to go near field or far field rather than doubling my workflow time killing unwanted points. Galleries and shops with lots of white walls that look alike and some fancier up market shops by stitching over wider areas actually introduce more real world stitching faults. 10 seems more tolerant even now and switching to manual.

I would really like PTGUI 10 to behave like 11 when stitching indoors. I have raised this before and I am not trying to irritate.